More graphic goodness! And strange glimpses into my life...

 



Images Page II ---Oodles and Boodles of OOPARTS Fun!

Click on Images to see the full sized graphic

The common accepted scientific view of evolution in the Cenozoic Era shows human beings appearing on the earth about 1.6 million years ago, and human civilization just 10,000 years ago. Yet the anomalous scientific finds shown below present a very disturbing and alternate reality. This is considered "Forbidden Archeology" and not ever brought up in polite science circles. It would be akin to saying you enjoyed the taste of blood to support such theories. But the proof is there. So we can only suppose that the fear of having all those fancy degrees turn worthless brought them to the conclusion that it's much easier to treat us like mushrooms. 


 

Here are the Droppa Stones mentioned in BMN for Thursday, May 11th.

 


 

 

Artist rendition of an anomalous coin.

At Lawn Ridge, 20 miles north of Peoria, Illinois, in August of 1870, three men were drilling an artesian well, when - from a depth of over a hundred feet - the pump brought up a small metal medallion to the surface. One of the workmen, Jacob W. Moffit, from Chillicothe, was the first to discover it in the drill residue. A noted scholar of the time, Professor Alexander Winchell, reported in his book Sparks From a Geologist's Hammer, that he received from another eye-witness, W.H. Wilmot, a detailed statement, dated December 4, 1871, of the deposits and depths of materials made during the boring, and the position where the metal "coin" was uncovered. The stratification took this form: Soil - 3 feet; yellow clay - 17 feet; blue clay - 44 feet; dark vegetable matter - 4 feet; hard purplish clay - 18 feet; bright green clay - 8 feet; mottled clay - 18 feet; paleosol (ancient soils) - 2 feet; coin location; yellowish clay - 1 foot; sand, clay and water - 11 feet. The strange "coin-medallion" was composed of an unidentified copper alloy, about the size and thickness of a U.S. quarter of that period. It was remarkably uniform in thickness, round, and the edges appeared to have been cut. Researcher William E. Dubois, who presented his investigation of the medallion to the American Philosophical Society, was convinced that the object had in fact passed through a rolling mill, the edges showed "further evidence of the machine shop." Despite its "modern characteristics", however, Dubois plainly saw that, upon the object, "the tooth of time is plainly visible."

Both sides of the medallion were marked with artwork and hieroglyphs, but these had not been metal-engraved or stamped. Rather, the figures had somehow been etched in acid, to a remarkable degree of intricacy. One side showed the figure of a woman wearing a crown or headdress; her left arm is raised as if in benediction, and her right arm holds a small child, also crowned. The woman appears to be speaking. On the opposite side is another central figure, that looks like a crouching animal: it has long, pointed ears, large eyes and mouth, claw-like arms, and a long tail frayed at the very end. Below and to the left of it is another animal, which bears a strong resemblance to a horse. Around the outer edges of both sides of the coin are undecipherable glyphs - they are of very definite character, and show all the signs of a form of alphabetic writing.

In 1876, the medallion was presented by Professor Winchell to a meeting of the Geological Section of the American Association in Buffalo. Having examined all the evidence, Winchell was convinced the coin had indeed come from this depth. It had not fallen into a hole in the past or put there as a hoax, as some put forth as a possibility to the coin's resting place - the sediments drilled through were uniform and undisturbed. And the amount of sedimentation was not what would have settled in only a few centuries. In fact, recent calculations based on uniform rates of alluvium deposition and radioisotope dates for this region estimate an age for materials from just below a depth of 100 feet to be between 100,000 and 150,000 years.

 

 

 

The Willendorf Venus, from Europe is dated at 30,000 years old.  Also interesting to note, is that on the head appears to be a design of sorts. What scientists and archeologists who dare to speak out have suggested, is that the figurine is wearing a textile head covering of some design. The detail work close up is very fine and detailed, with apparent fine stitching. So who was the tailor for this Venus? Considering it was over 30,000 years old, according to accepted archeology we were still in caves and grunting. This figurine raises serious doubts as to the accepted dating of mankind.

 

 

 

In 1913, During his stay at Olduvai Gorge, Professor Hans Reck of Berlin University, conducted investigations at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, then on over to German East Africa.   Reck found a thoroughly modern human skeleton that remains a source of raging debate to this day. This modern skull is from a fully human skeleton he found in 1913. The human skeletal remains, including this complete skull, were so firmly cemented in the rock that it had to be chipped with hammers and chisels. It was found in the upper end of a rock bed dated at more than 1,000,000 years old.

Is the past not as fixed and known as the mainstream scientists and institutions such as the Smithsonian would have us believe? I'll give credit where credit is due...I actually love the Smithsonian and could live there looking at all the cool things they have. But I know of probably just a small portion of what they haven't told us. And what they don't tell us has been some of the most astonishing finds in history. And that's the coolest stuff.  I'm not sure what they are afraid of...heaven, hell, or unemployment... I just wish they would come clean with what they have found. Like the ancient burial grounds of giants they supposedly found in the Northern US. Warriors ten feet tall, and larger. With full armor and battle gear. Fully adorned with jewelry and other artifacts to accompany them into the afterlife. All of it was allegedly taken by the Smithsonian, and a lot of it was reported destroyed. Of course there is no proof...they saw to that. 

 

 

 

 

In 1896, workers excavating a dry dock in Buenos Aires found a modern human skull. The Pre-Ensenadan stratum in which the Buenos Aires skull was found is a least 1.0 - 1.5 million years old. Even at 1 million years the presence of a fully modern human skull anywhere in the world is highly anomalous. But becoming more and more common as we dig the top of the Earth off, and are faced with our own past...

 

 

 

 

 

In 1860, Professor Giuseppe Ragazzoni, a geologist and teacher at the Technical Institute of Brescia, went to the nearby locale of Castenedolo, about 10 kilometers southeast of Brescia, to gather fossil shells in the Pliocene strata exposed in a pit at the base of a low hill, the Colle de Vento. Here he discovered this remarkable and anatomically modern human skull. The stratum from which it was taken is assigned to the Astian stage of the Pliocene. According to modern authorities, the Astian belongs to the Middle Pliocene, which would give the skull an age of 3 - 4 million years.

 

 

 

 

 

A small human image, skillfully formed in clay, was found in 1889 at Nampa, Idaho. The figurine came from the the 300-foot level of a well boring, and dated to be of the Plio-Pleistocene age, about 2 million years ago. G. F. Wright noted, "The image is about an inch and a half long; and remarkable for the perfection with which it represents the human form... It was a female figure, and had the lifelike lineaments in the parts which were finished that would do credit to the classic centers of art. Upon showing the object to Professor F. W. Putnam," wrote Wright, "he at once directed attention to the character of the incrustations of iron upon the surface as indicative of a relic of considerable antiquity. There were patches of anhydrous red oxide of iron in protected places upon it, such as could not have been formed upon any fraudulent object."

 

 

 

The April 1862 edition of The Geologist included an English translation of the following  report by Maximilien Melleville, the vice president of the Societe Academique of Laon , France.

"It really is penetrated over four-fifths of its height by a black bituminous color that merges toward the top into a yellow circle, and which is evidently due to the contact of the lignite in which it had been for so long a time plunged. The upper part, which was in contact with the shell bed, on the contrary has preserved its natural color,   the dull white of the chalk.... As to the rock in which it was found, I can affirm that it is perfectly virgin, and presents no trace whatever of any ancient exploitation. As extraordinary as it might seem to those attached to standard evolutionary views, the evidence associated in this find suggest that if humans made the ball, they must have been in France 45 - 55 million years ago. This chalk ball was discovered in an Early Eocene lignite bed. On the basis of its stratigraphic position, is has been assigned a date of 45 - 55 million years ago."

 According to Melleville, there was no possibility that the chalk ball was a forgery.

What I really want to know is, was it made to play hopscotch with? I'm sorry... I'm so terribly irreverent besides being a heretic. 

 

 

 

In 1877,  J. H. Neale was superintendent of the Montezuma Tunnel Company, and ran the Montezuma tunnel into the gravel underlying the lava of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County. At a distance of between 1400 and 1500 feet from the mouth of the tunnel, or of between 200 and 300 feet beyond the edge of the solid lava, Mr. Neale saw several spear-heads of some dark rock and nearly a foot in length. On  looking closer, he found a small mortar three or four inches in diameter and of irregular shape. This was discovered within a foot or two of the spear-heads. He then found a large well-formed pestle and near by a large and very regular mortar. All of these relics were found the same afternoon, and were all within a few feet of one another and close to the bed-rock. Mr. Neale insists that it is completely impossible that these relics could have reached the position they were found in except at the time the gravel was deposited, and before the lava cap formed. The position of the artifacts in gravel close to the bed-rock at Tuolumne Table Mountain indicates they were between 33-55 million years old.

 

 

 

Tracks out of Time---600 MILLION Year Old Tracks

On June 1, 1968, an amateur rock hunter, William J. Meister, of Kearns, Utah was visiting nearby Antelope Springs with his family. The area, which includes the Swasey Mountains and the Cambrian Wheeler shale formation, is famous for its many fossils, and on this particular day Meister was on a hunt for fossilized trilobites and brachiopods - according to evolutionary theory, once among the oldest known living creatures. Meister broke off a rock slab, and, tapping its edge with a hammer, it fell open in two pieces, like the leaves of a book. To his astonishment, inside was a human sandal print, pointed in the toes, rounded in the heel, and with a squashed trilobite in the center of the sole. The sandal print measured 10 1/4 inches long, 31/2 inches wide at the ball and 3 inches at the heel. The sandal appears to have been well-worn on the right side - indicating it had been worn on the right foot - and the heel impression is deeper by one-eighth of an inch, characteristic of the weight distribution of humans on the foot. This particular find was later examined by Dr. Hellmut H. Doelling, of the Utah Geological Survey, and he found no irregularities or evidence of fakery - the print was genuine.

On July 20th, Meister returned to Antelope Springs with professional geologist Dr. Clifford Burdick. Digging in the same locality, Burdick discovered another imprint in the Cambrian shale, this time of a child The print was 6 inches long, and the five toes were barely distinguishable, as if the child was wearing moccasins. Yet Burdick detected that the toes were spread out, indicating the child had only begun to wear shoes, which tend to compress the toes with age. The heel and arch were again well depressed, showing weight distribution, and a segment of a fossil was crushed in its middle. Burdick managed to find a larger fossil imprint, like Meister's original, though the impression was shallower, and also unearthed a second child's track, smaller than the first, with the toes broken off, but perfect in its other aspects. Later, a detailed examination revealed that the rock in which the prints were found was made of tiny layers, and where the foot-marks occur, the layers were bowed downward from the horizontal - demonstrating that weight had indeed, been pressed into the once prehistoric mud.

But that prehistoric mud with its tell-tale prints is now Cambrian shale - an astonishing 600 million years old. And the fossils in the prints are trilobites - supposed to be among the earliest forms of life on earth. This time, we have literally hit "rock bottom" in the fossil record - and yet here we find the presence of man, and an intelligent, shoe-wearing man at that. How could he have "evolved" from simple life, when the Cambrian prints testify that he is as old as life itself? Still not convinced? There are other stories about "Footprints Out Of Time..."  And I'll be writing about quite a few of them under the Blue Moon....

 

 

 

This is only a small sampling of anomalous artifacts found all over the world in the strangest locations.

I'll be adding to my image archives at every opportunity so if this is your field of interest please stop by on an irregular basis. You never know what you might find next under the Blue Moon... And please look up the book "Forbidden Archeology" where some of this information came from. (It's a lot cheaper at Amazon.com than what I paid for it, that's for damn sure.)

It's a virtual gold mine of anomalous artifacts and archeological finds that were deliberately covered up and/or falsified for whatever twisted reason they want to hand us. Such as "Piltdown Man" being nothing more than a hoax, where they glued together different parts, including bones from a monkey, and passed it off as the missing link. But seriously?  I'm seriously getting tired of being fed bull and kept in the dark. Do they really consider us to be so naive that we'll accept everything? They are, after all, just men and women trying to keep their jobs without having to throw the text books out and start all over again. But then I suppose that Doctorate degrees don't come cheap.

Then there is the theory that time travel in the future sends man back to our ancient past. But the absence of any ancient beer cans would seem to discount that particular theory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter
ęCopyright 1997-2005 RAW & Blue Moon News All Rights Reserved
 

    

Entrance | Home | Newsletter| Images I | Images II | Images III | Images IV| Images V |Images VI |Search| Links | Heroes| Who? | GNOSTICS| News | FeedbackBlack Madonna | Hamsters | Chokers | Angel Astrology